Skip to Content

Tell Me Something I Don't Already Know: Learning in Low- and High-Inflation Settings

Author Image Placeholder
Michael Weber University of Chicago and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Author Image Placeholder
Bernardo Candia University of California, Berkeley
Author Image Placeholder
Tiziano Ropele Bank of Italy
Author Image Placeholder
Rodrigo Lluberas Universidad ORT
Author Image Placeholder
Serafin Frache Universidad de Montevideo
Headshot of Brent Meyer
Brent Meyer Vice President and Senior Economist
Author Image Placeholder
Saten Kumar Auckland University of Technology
Author Image Placeholder
Yuriy Gorodnichenko University of California, Berkeley and NBER
Author Image Placeholder
Dimitris Georgarakos European Central Bank
Author Image Placeholder
Olivier Coibion University of Texas at Austin
Author Image Placeholder
Geoff Kenny European Central Bank

Summary

Using randomized control trials applied over time in different countries, the authors of this working paper study how the economic environment affects how agents learn from new information. In higher-inflation environments, firms become more attentive and informed about inflation, responding less to exogenously provided information about inflation and monetary policy.

View Paper

Working Paper 2023-8

Abstract: Using randomized control trials (RCT) applied over time in different countries, we study how the economic environment affects how agents learn from new information. We show that as inflation has risen in developed economies, both households and firms have become more attentive and informed about inflation, leading them to respond less to exogenously provided information about inflation and monetary policy. This observation holds for both firms and households. We also study the effects of RCTs in countries where inflation has been consistently high (Uruguay) and low (New Zealand) as well as what happens when the same agents are repeatedly provided information in both low- and high-inflation environments (Italy). Our results broadly support models in which inattention is an endogenous outcome that depends on the economic environment.

JEL classification: E3, E4, E5

Key words: inattention, RCTs, inflation expectation

Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.29338/wp2023-08


The authors thank the Fama-Miller Center and the Initiative on Global Markets, both at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business for financial support for conducting the surveys as well as the National Science Foundation (SES #1919307). They also thank Antar Diallo and Justus Meyer for research assistance and Shannon Hazlett at NielsenIQ for her assistance with the collection of the PanelViews Survey. The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the European Central Bank, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of Uruguay, or the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta or the Federal Reserve System. Any remaining errors are the authors' responsibility. Ordering of author names is randomized.

Please address questions regarding content to Michael Weber, the University of Chicago and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Bernardo Candia, the University of California, Berkeley; Tiziano Ropele, the Bank of Italy; Rodrigo Lluberas, Universidad ORT; Serafin Frache, Universidad de Montevideo; Brent Meyer, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta; Saten Kumar, Auckland University of Technology; Yuriy Gorodnichenko, the University of California, Berkeley and NBER; Dimitris Georgarakos, European Central Bank; Olivier Coibion, University of Texas at Austin and NBER; Geoff Kenny, the European Central Bank; and Jorge Ponce, the Bank of Uruguay.

To receive e-mail notifications about new papers, subscribe. Under "Publications" select "Working Papers."